The Cost of Compromise: Why CISOs Should Reject “Good-Enough” Security

4 Pages

CISOs play a critical role in shaping an organization’s security posture, balancing risk, strategy, and budget to support business goals. However, when cost concerns outweigh usability, effectiveness, and integration needs, organizations may default to bundled security suites that offer convenience but compromise true protection. This tradeoff can weaken defenses over time. CISOs must clearly communicate why purpose‑built security tools are necessary, what value they deliver, and how they justify their place in the budget to ensure strong, sustainable security outcomes.

Join for free to read

Report MICROSOFT DEFENDER FOR OFFICE 365: IS IT GOOD ENOUGH?

White Paper When Good Enough Isn’t Good Enough: Data Protection Where It…

Ebook The Cost of ‘Good Enough’ Security: Calculating the True Value…

Case Study When “Good Enough” Data is Not Good Enough

More from Exabeam

White Paper Supporting the Directives of NIS2

White Paper Operationalizing Continuous Improvement in the Age of Advanced…

Case Study Helping Meissner Make Sense of Masses of Security Data

White Paper The False Promises of Single-Vendor Security Portfolios: A Primer

White Paper

The Cost of Compromise: Why CISOs Should Reject “Good-Enough” Security

The Cost of Compromise: Why CISOs Should Reject “Good-Enough” Security

You Might Also Like

More from Exabeam